There’s a secret to writing middle-grade—well actually, it’s
not all that much of a secret. To write for the eight-to-twelve year-old kid,
you have to be able to think like a kid. Remember what it was like
to have your lunch stolen (or maybe just your pudding cup, but that’s bad
enough, wouldn’t you say?). Feel that brick in your stomach when
you’re bringing a bad report card home. Stick out your tongue and get stuck to a lamppost, or at least imagine it (since that one's sort of a bad idea and all).
When I wrote DOUBLE VISION, that connection to a twelve year-old
was the most important and enjoyable part of writing Linc Baker’s (that’s
my main character) story. I want my books to be fun reads, and hope to keep
that kid connection going as I write the series sequels. It's fun to be twelve, even if it's just pretend.
So to me, the biggest crime a writer of middle-grade or YA
can commit is to lecture to kids. I hate it. And it happens far more often than
you’d think. I can’t count the times that an aspiring MG writer has told me: “I
want to write my book so I can teach kids that (bullying,
cheating—fill in the life lesson) is bad.
Don’t get me wrong—I get the intention of these writers. The truth is, there are many published books that have
these life lessons clearly stated on the page. Usually, there’s some sort of
wise grown-up delivering that message. And I think those message-driven books
are a crime—just my opinion, but I’ll bet if you ask a random MGer that they’ll
pass on the lesson too.
Here’s why I think this kind of writing is a crime:
1. Kids don’t need another lesson.
Think like a twelve year-old for a second: how many times a
day are you told to do something, act a certain way, stay in your seat, finish
your dinner—I could go on for a while, but you get my point. Kids get told what
to do all day long.
2. Reading should be fun.
Do you like life lessons woven into your nighttime
blockbuster read? I sincerely hope not. Let’s leave the afterschool specials in
the eighties, where they belong. Reading mysteries should be fun.
3. It’s cheating.
Now, we all want to say something with our fiction, right?
But being didactic with your important life lessons is just plain cheating as a
writer—it’s the ultimate violation of the show-don’t-tell rule. Instead of
telling your kid reader that he shouldn’t cheat on his test, show him the
consequences. And add a good bicycle chase scene while you’re at it—those are
so much more fun anyway.
4. We want kids to keep reading.
This one’s sort of obvious, but do you think kids will pick
up books after the required reading is over if we cram them full of Valuable
Life Lessons? Of course not. Make your story fun. Leave the lessons for Mom,
Dad, teachers, and other parental types. They've got it covered, trust me.
I’m all for having something to say—I’m pretty opinionated
myself, as you can probably tell. But write your books from the kid
perspective, my fellow writerly people, not from the adults’. Or I may just
come over and roll my eyes at you. Don’t say you weren’t warned.
How about you, Sleuths and Spies? Any criminal writing you want to
share?
Thanks for this post - it's a great reminder about what's important in writing MG. I agree with all your points! Reading should be for fun first, and learning later.
ReplyDeleteThe fun is why I love MG too :-) Thanks for stopping by, Andrea!
ReplyDeleteExcellent points! Lecturing anyone, but especially kids, is bad. And talking down to them. Anyone who has had a conversation with a nine-year-old recently knows how smart they are.
ReplyDeleteI think that's the hardest part of writing MG--you have to be as smart and observant as a tween. It's hard...
ReplyDeleteHear, hear! Kids have enough lecturing on Valuable Lessons to have it seep into their reading, as well! Great post.
ReplyDeleteVery rapidly this web page will be famous among all blogging people, due to it's pleasant articles
ReplyDeleteStop by my web page ; http://www.ausfaces.com.au